Democratization of the Camera

The global proliferation of technology has contributed to the 21st century’s documentary boom.

(A boom that’s outlined in the new documentary Subject, which we’ll tackle later this week).

Once upon a time, only a scant few had access to the resources necessary to complete a documentary. But cameras are everywhere nowadays, allowing the previously equipment-disenfranchised to document what was once gatekept.

Which has liberated first-person accounts of war. The 20th century required more sizable film-crews to tread into war zones to document on-the-ground warfare. But in this century, one camera can approximate the work of a last-century crew.

And the results gobsmack, to such a degree that they’ve become staples of Academy Awards consideration. A few examples:

In For Sama — nominated a few years ago — a local Syrian was able to film her country’s devastating civil-war thanks to her cellphone camera.

This year’s 20 Days in Mariupol — a major competitor for the prize — swaps out For Sama’s cellphone with a widely-accessible higher-end camera, chronicling the first 20 days of Russia’s ONGOING Ukraine invasion. In the warp-speed of The Technology Age, we can watch a feature-length documentary in theaters about a current war the year after it commences.

Towards this end, both of last year’s shortlisted Retrograde and this year’s contender Bobi Wine: The People’s President follow the daily lives of being-deposed leaders as they navigate the targets placed on their backs IN THE MIDDLE OF a national coup.

Leave a comment